>To be native to a place we must learn to speak its language > _Robin Wall Kimmerer_
I suggested that Thompson join me and metaphorically Rake in the Field of computer programming.
I suggest things to type into the console command line.
We have created some numbers and strings which we save in variables. Strings have a length, a property of string objects.
z (2) [5, "five"]
We have created an array that holds the values we had stored in x and y. The array becomes the value of z.
z (3) [5, "five", 3.14]
Arrays have a property length, a number, and property push, a function, that modifies the array. Function joins number, string and array as basic types.
z (4) [5, "five", 3.14, Array(4)]
z (4) [5, "five", 3.14, Array(4)]
z (5) [5, "five", 3.14, Array(5), 3.141592653589793]
We push a more accurate pi onto the array to make five elements. We see from this print that the array within the array has grown to five elements too because it is the same array.
intention exploring evidence this is interesting... what does it mean?
I wanted to expose Thompson to programming at pretty much the same level Alan Kay spoke to kids. Alan and I both feel the power in the abstraction and want to share it.
I wasn't sure I could lead a tour that would be both short and meaningful. I became more engaged as we progressed. My wife, half listening, laughed with horror when I suggested pushing x into x. Now we both need to know, what would happen.
The computer is a machine made out of small simple parts. It is only complicated because there are billions of them. There are a few hundred kinds of parts and a few dozen ways of making each. This is still a lot to know but it is knowable. People know it.
I am a curious learner about learning. I see myself as an experiment. Perhaps, in my explorations, I might stumble upon insights that illuminate a greater meaning. It was with that curiosity that I first started writing in the wiki.
But now Ward is leading me into another journey. One where I have an 'everyman' fear when in the audience of code wizards. There is much to understand and little that is immediately obvious. Having spent years around developers, I have known how to nod knowingly without knowing.
I first learned to code in the simplest way when I was in middle school. We had a terminal that connected to a computer at a nearby college – a timeshare arrangement. I learned to type into a terminal that punched a tape holding a simple program that would then be read back in to be run. But I was not curious enough to continue my explorations.
I was curious again when PCs were first introduced in the earlier eighties. Enough so that I learned to program a time management system for a design company that I was working at as a photographer. My thinking became obsessive and I once again walked away.
That was over thirty years ago. Most has been lost, much like my paltry Chinese. Forgotten unlearned languages.
But now I am curious about learning how understanding emerges that empowers creativity – these inference networks known as Markov Blankets.
Parent, child and child's parents forming increasing complex meaning matrices in our schema.
So we begin: 2+3=5.
We find ourselves quickly led to an unexpected philosophical question: what might it mean for an array, an object, to hold itself as a fractal expression? At least the browser didn't crash.
Curiosity: another experiment.